After describing his own encounter with a bear which he was unable to strike with a rapier, the dancer concludes: On the one hand, Kleist poses the question of ideal theatricality. The turning point of the piece is when the dancer gives his explanation for this superiority. The comparison between the aesthetic qualities of live performers and those carved from wood has not ceased since the Romantic era and is being used to affirm the art of puppetry as a genre in its own right. On the Marionette Theatre.

They know that they are naked and feel that they must cover themselves. The Major Works of Heinrich von Kleist. On the one hand, Kleist poses the question of ideal theatricality. Their knowingness fractures their being. German Issue April This judgement, that above all criticized the Berlin style of August Wilhelm Iffland, was symptomatic of the theatrical situation of the time.

Kleist on Puppets – In-Between Two Worlds

This is why Marionettetnheater made the following theorem: On the Marionette Theatre. It takes the form of a conversation between the narrator and a friend who is principal dancer at the local theatre. Kleist was part of the Romantic tradition. Not just an inert accumulation of facts surely — but knowledge of a higher order.

kleist essay marionettentheater

At first glance is seems like a narrative, but it quickly turns into a kind of speculative essay, with philosophical marionettenthetaer even theological overtones.

In so doing, they have disobeyed God, and they have lost their innocence and unreflectivity.

And Kleist makes knowing readers of us all. But it does remind us that Kleist explores with great subtlety and resonance the value schemes, the textures of cognition and feeling by which men and women, in their self-consciousness, live.


Kleist on Puppets

It is a wonderful essay, lightly handled, held in the conversational mode, unsystematic and thought-provoking. Indeed, other artists of Kkeist, such as E. Genesis Chapter 3 is a key intertext here; Adam and Eve are driven out of Paradise because they have eaten of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. Their knowingness fractures their being. Hand to Mouth ; repr.

Über das Marionettentheater – German Literature

In other words, there is a loss of unity. The turning point of the piece is when the dancer gives his explanation for this superiority. And the essay concludes with reflections on how self-consciousness could be redeemed from its destructive effects — perhaps by attaining the infinite self-consciousness of the divinity, or perhaps by a second eating of the fruit of the Marionettnetheater of Knowledge which marionettenntheater return the human self to its paradisal innocence.

kleist essay marionettentheater

It is happening all the time. It is nothing other than the path taken by the soul of the dancer.

German Issue April He is struck by his own beauty, and by the pose that is marionettdntheater of a classical statue. Only the marionette would be likely to represent this theatricality, because it has no life outside the theatre.

But every attempt on his part to repeat the pose fails.

Heinrich von Kleist

We have to go on and make the journey round the world to see if it is perhaps open somewhere at the back. We know that we have no choice but to be knowing creatures, knowing in both body and mind. Having ,arionettentheater that his friend has often attended performances of marionettes in the town square, the narrator asks him why he is so interested in such vulgar and mechanical performances.


kleist essay marionettentheater

Mahlmann, Jean Paul Johann Paul Friedrich Richter and Ludwig Tieck, considered the puppet as the antagonist of the actor and thus expressed their deep dissatisfaction with the art of the flesh and blood performer.

Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, Proceedings of a Franco-German Symposium]. Maison de Heidelberg, Kleist recounts how a beautiful young man, one who is old enough to be attractive to women and who is therefore aware of the sexual appeal of his own body, sees himself in a mirror resting his foot on a stool. That is in the puppet or in the god.

The main reason, he argues, is that unlike a human, a puppet can never be guilty of affectation: Les Solitaires intempestifs, For Kleist, the marionette is subject to the laws of mechanics, avoiding the unilateral nature of human individuality, and obeying the wishes of the puppeteer, which thus makes it the perfect interpreter.